The Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act were attempts by Congress to

From Ballotpedia

The Administrative State Project
Five Pillars of the Administrative State • Nondelegation
• Judicial deference
• Executive control
• Procedural rights
• Agency dynamics
Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a federal law passed in 1890 that banned trusts and monopolies in industry, authorizing the federal government to dissolve trusts and break up monopolies as part of its power to regulate interstate commerce. It was the first modern American antitrust law and laid the foundation for Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft's attempts to break up large industrial trusts.[1]

Background

The Sherman Antitrust Act was signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison in 1890. It was sponsored by Senator John Sherman of Ohio and came in response to public concerns over the increasing prevalence of trusts and their power to artificially increase prices and discourage competition.[2]

Provisions

Ban on Trusts

Section 1 of the act banned all industrial trusts.

Every contract, combination in the form of trust or other- wise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal.[1][3]


Section 2 contained a similar ban on monopolies, specifically ones that did not occur naturally and were instead the result of anti-competitive practices.

Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor...[1][3]

Enforcement

Like the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, the Sherman Antitrust Act relied on the federal circuit courts for its enforcement. If a violation occurred, a federal district attorney could initiate proceedings in equity, which could result in a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or the dismantling of a trust.[1]

Section 6 of the act held that any property held by a trust or organization that violated Section 1 could be seized by the federal government after forfeiture proceedings.[1]

Section 7 gave standing to sue for damages in a circuit court to any person or corporation injured in their "business or property" by any entity that violated Section 1.[1]

Amending statutes

Below is a partial list of subsequent laws that amended provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act:

  • Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 expanded on the Sherman Antitrust Act and added new provisions and enforcement schemes.[4]

See also

  • Clayton Antitrust Act
  • Interstate Commerce Act
  • Gibbons v. Ogden
  • Wickard v. Filburn
  • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
  • United States v. Lopez

External links

  • Full text of the act
  • Search Google News for this topic

Footnotes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 OurDocuments.gov, "Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890)," accessed January 2, 2018
  2. OurDocuments.gov, "Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890)," accessed January 2, 2018
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. History.House.gov, "The Clayton Antitrust Act," accessed January 2, 2018

v  e

The Administrative State Project
Main

The Administrative State Project main page • Administrative State Project Index • Glossary of administrative state terms • Quotes about the administrative state • Administrative state • Rulemaking • Deference • Adjudication • Nondelegation doctrine

Reporting

Changes to the Federal Register • Completed OIRA review of federal administrative agency rules • Federal agency rules repealed under the Congressional Review Act • Historical additions to the Federal Register, 1936-2016 • Pages added monthly to the Federal Register, 1995-2017

Laws

Administrative Procedure Act • Antiquities Act • Civil Service Reform Act • Clayton Antitrust Act • Communications Act of 1934 • Congressional Review Act • Electronic Freedom of Information Act • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 • Federal Housekeeping Statute • Federal Reserve Act • Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 • Freedom of Information Act • Government in the Sunshine Act • Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 • Information Quality Act • Interstate Commerce Act • National Labor Relations Act • Paperwork Reduction Act • Pendleton Act • Privacy Act of 1974 • Regulatory Flexibility Act • REINS Act • REINS Act (Wisconsin) • Securities Act of 1933 • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Sherman Antitrust Act • Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act • Truth in Regulating Act • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Cases

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States • Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp • Auer v. Robbins • Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of California • Field v. Clark • Food and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation • Humphrey's Executor v. United States • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Chadha • J.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United States • Lucia v. SEC • Marshall v. Barlow's • Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency • Mistretta v. United States • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company • National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. • United States v. Lopez • United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. • Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council • Wayman v. Southard • Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service • Whitman v. American Trucking Associations • Wickard v. Filburn • Wiener v. United States

Terms

Adjudication (administrative state) • Administrative judge • Administrative law • Administrative law judge • Administrative state • Arbitrary-or-capricious test • Auer deference • Barrier to entry • Bootleggers and Baptists • Chevron deference (doctrine) • Civil servant • Civil service • Code of Federal Regulations • Codify (administrative state) • Comment period • Compliance costs • Congressional Record • Coordination (administrative state) • Deference (administrative state) • Direct and indirect costs (administrative state) • Enabling statute • Ex parte communication (administrative state) • Executive agency • Federal law • Federal Register • Federalism • Final rule • Formal rulemaking • Formalism (law) • Functionalism (law) • Guidance (administrative state) • Hybrid rulemaking • Incorporation by reference • Independent federal agency • Informal rulemaking • Joint resolution of disapproval (administrative state) • Major rule • Negotiated rulemaking • Nondelegation doctrine • OIRA prompt letter • Organic statute • Pragmatism (law) • Precautionary principle • Promulgate • Proposed rule • Publication rulemaking • Regulatory budget • Regulatory capture • Regulatory dark matter • Regulatory impact analysis • Regulatory policy officer • Regulatory reform officer • Regulatory review • Rent seeking • Retrospective regulatory review • Risk assessment (administrative state) • Rulemaking • Separation of powers • Significant regulatory action • Skidmore deference • Statutory authority • Substantive law and procedural law • Sue and settle • Sunset provision • Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions • United States Code • United States Statutes at Large

Bibliography

  • "Administrative Law - The 20th Century Bequeaths an 'Illegitimate Exotic' in Full and Terrifying Flower" by Stephen P. Dresch (2000)
  • "Confronting the Administrative Threat" by Philip Hamburger and Tony Mills (2017)
  • "Constitutionalism after the New Deal" by Cass R. Sunstein (1987)
  • Federalist No. 23 by Alexander Hamilton (1787)
  • "From Administrative State to Constitutional Government" by Joseph Postell (2012)
  • "Interring the Nondelegation Doctrine" by Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule (2002)
  • "Rulemaking as Legislating" by Kathryn Watts (2015)
  • "The Checks & Balances of the Regulatory State" by Paul R. Verkuil (2016)
  • "The Myth of the Nondelegation Doctrine" by Keith E. Whittington and Jason Iuliano (2017)
  • "The Progressive Origins of the Administrative State: Wilson, Goodnow, and Landis" by Ronald J. Pestritto (2007)
  • "The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State" by Gary Lawson (1994)
  • "The Study of Administration" by Woodrow Wilson (1887)
  • "The Threat to Liberty" by Steven F. Hayward (2017)
  • "Why the Modern Administrative State Is Inconsistent with the Rule of Law" by Richard A. Epstein (2008)

Agencies

Administrative Conference of the United States • United States Civil Service Commission • U.S. Government Accountability Office • U.S. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs • U.S. Office of Management and Budget

v  e

Ballotpedia
About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy

Communications: Alison Graves • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski • Caitlin Vanden Boom
External Relations: Alison Prange • Moira Delaney • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski • Mandy Morris• Kelly Rindfleisch
Policy: Christopher Nelson • Caitlin Styrsky • Molly Byrne • Katharine Frey • Jimmy McAllister • Samuel Postell
Research: Josh Altic, Managing Editor
Tech: Matt Latourelle • Nathan Bingham • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Joseph Sanchez

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

Editorial

Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Emma Burlingame • Marielle Bricker •Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Nicole Fisher • Juan García de Paredes • Sara Horton • Tyler King • Doug Kronaizl • David Luchs • Roneka Matheny • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus •Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Samantha Post • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Myj Saintyl • Maddie Sinclair Johnson • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Joel Williams • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora

What did the Sherman Antitrust Act outlaw?

The Sherman Antitrust Act outlawed monopolistic practices. What is the difference between the Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act? The Interstate Commerce Act regulated the railroads and made them charge fair and just prices for their services. The Sherman Antitrust Act outlawed monopolistic practices.

What was the impact of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?

2 extremes of wealth and poverty 3. absence of international conflicts 4. achievements of the labor movement a federal regulatory agency was established When the Interstate Commerce Act was passed in 1887, it marked the first time that 1. Congress officially affirmed its laissez-faire economic policy

How effective was the Sherman Act against industrial monopolies?

For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. Its only effective use was against trade unions,...

When was the Sherman Act first enforced?

The first vigorous enforcement of the Sherman Act occurred during the administration of President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–09). In 1914 Congress passed two legislative measures that provided support for the Sherman Act.

What was the purpose of the Interstate Commerce Act quizlet?

The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 is a United States federal law that was designed to regulate the railroad industry, particularly its monopolistic practices. The Act required that railroad rates be "reasonable and just," but did not empower the government to fix specific rates.

What is the purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act quizlet?

- The major purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act was to prohibit monopolies and sustain competition so as to protect companies from each other and to protect consumers from unfair business practices.

What was the most important purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act?

What is the purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act? The Sherman Antitrust Act was enacted in 1890 to curtail combinations of power that interfere with trade and reduce economic competition. It outlaws both formal cartels and attempts to monopolize any part of commerce in the United States.

What was a goal of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890?

Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a federal statute which prohibits activities that restrict interstate commerce and competition in the marketplace. It outlaws any contract, conspiracy, or combination of business interests in restraint of foreign or interstate trade.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte