The economic development of the colonies in Mexico and Peru was dominated by

The Colonial Economy of New Spain

• Jeremy BaskesDepartment of History, Ohio Wesleyan University

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription

Introduction

The Aztecs and Inca were the dominant cultural groups in Mexico and Peru, respectively, upon the arrival of the Spaniards in the sixteenth century. After the conquest, Spain imposed distinctive forms of colonial rule over Mexico and Peru in response to the Native traditions they encountered. The Indigenous peoples of the Americas continued to express themselves in a variety of media after the conquest, and traces of an Indigenous mindset or worldview can be found in these forms; however, the Native and European worlds were quickly entangled and the Native worlds fundamentally changed. Though Native forms survived, they did so in changed circumstances and conditions, often in response to colonialism and as a form of negotiation and survival in a new world order. For example, many Native artists were influenced by European styles and techniques, as revealed by the more representational motifs appearing in 16th-century Andean art and greater illusionism in Mexican art. Moreover, many Natives learned to write alphabetically, so past oral traditions once preserved in songs, poems, pictorial books, and khipus were soon converted into alphabetic script. Other traditional forms of expression, such as the feather works of the Nahuas or the queros of the Inca, continued to be created by the Indigenous peoples after the conquest, but their styles, functions, and subject matter changed due to their new colonial contexts. Indeed, one of the greatest dialogues between the Native worlds and that of Europe took place in the religious realm. The imposition of Christianity and its attendant material culture created new opportunities for Native expression to flourish. Though the architecture, painting, and sculpture of the churches now served Christian ends, their Native authorship and preconquest influences are often clear. Religious dramas, too, preserved traces of Native expression, though again with a Christian visage. Here, then, this article takes a broad view, focusing on traditional forms of expression and those imposed by Spain but focusing on the Indigenous side of this dialogue, when known, and as it became manifest in expressive forms. Mexico and Peru are treated separately because many of their forms of expression differ. So too did the colonial projects of each continent, owing to their different cultural traditions. Because some of the key sources for Native expression date to the early seventeenth century (and beyond), this article takes a broad view chronologically, focusing largely on the early colonial period and more recently published texts, when available, while directing students to the bibliographies of these sources for fuller historiographical information.

General Overviews

This article focuses on three types of expression—literary, performance, and visual. Each of these flourished to different degrees and in different forms in Mexico and Peru in the early colonial period. These categories are often not mutually exclusive. For example, the pictorial writings of the Aztecs that we interpret as visual culture can also be seen as literature, and the songs that were performed in Mexico and Peru are mostly known to us through written records and are accordingly treated as literature. These categories are useful to organize information, but readers should be aware that they are quite fluid when concerning Native Mexico and Peru.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.

How to Subscribe

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.

This is a preview. Log in through your library.

Abstract

Recent research shows that colonialism reversed levels of development in much of the non‐European world. To explain this reversal, analysts focus on conditions within the colonized areas. By contrast, drawing on evidence from Spanish and British colonialism, the authors show that the economic models of the colonizing nations also affected the reversals of fortune. Mercantilist Spain tended to colonize most extensively precolonial regions that were populous and highly developed; in turn, extensive Spanish colonization had negative consequences for postcolonial development. In comparison, liberal Britain tended to colonize most extensively precolonial regions that were sparsely populated and underdeveloped; in turn, extensive British colonialism had comparatively positive effects. Thus, both Spain and Britain reversed the fortunes of precolonial regions, but in largely opposite ways.

Journal Information

Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.Established in 1895 as the first US scholarly journal in its field, the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) presents pathbreaking work from all areas of sociology, with an emphasis on theory building and innovative methods. AJS strives to speak to the general sociology reader and is open to contributions from across the social sciences—political science, economics, history, anthropology, and statistics in addition to sociology—that seriously engage the sociological literature to forge new ways of understanding the social. AJS offers a substantial book review section that identifies the most salient work of both emerging and enduring scholars of social science. Commissioned review essays appear occasionally, offering the readers a comparative, in-depth examination of prominent titles.

Publisher Information

Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
© 2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Request Permissions

Why did Brazil develop more slowly than other areas of Latin America?

Which of the following were New World foods that revolutionized Old World agriculture?