Abstract Less developed countries do not conform easily to the accepted patterns of federalism set out in the literature. Third World constitutions tend to be short-lived and in many cases the federations have disintegrated or have become, in real terms, unitary states. Common factors are the strong influence of ethnic or territorial élites, whether of traditional or modern type, and the difficulty experienced by the regime in reversing anti-state norms left over from the preindependence period. Even where a federal solution is successfully legitimized, as in India, Malaysia, and Nigeria, it takes a centrally dominated form. Quasi-federal states such as Sudan and Cameroon exhibit a similar problem of the regime's legitimacy in culturally distinct peripheral areas. Federalism is chosen not for convenience but for survival. /// Les pays moins développés ne se conforment pas aisément aux modèles de fédéralisme acceptés et traités par la littérature. Les constitutions d'ordre fédéral tendent à avoir la vie courte et, dans plusieurs cas, les fédérations ont cédé a l'éclatement pour devenir, en réalité, des états unitaires. La grande influence des élites ethniques ou territoriales, qu'elles soient de type traditionnel ou moderne, et les difficultés que rencontre un tel régime pour renverser les normes antiétatiques remontant á la periode de pré-indépendance constituent les facteurs propres a ces federations. Meme aux endroits tels qu'en Inde, en Malaisie et au Nigéria où l'option du fédéralisme est légitimisée avec succès, le régime présente une structure dominée par le centre. Les états quasi-fédéraux comme le Soudan et le Cameroun rencontrent un problème similaire quant à la légitimité du régime dans les régions culturellement distinctes situées en périphérie. Le fédéralisme n'est pas un choix d'adaptation convenable mais un de survie. Show
Journal Information The International Political Science Review (IPSR) is the quarterly journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA). It is committed to publishing material that makes a significant contribution to international political science. It seeks to meet the needs of political scientists throughout the world who are interested in studying political phenomena in the contemporary context of increasing international interdependence and global change. The IPSR reflects the aims and intellectual tradition of its parent body, IPSA: to foster the creation and dissemination of rigorous political inquiry free of subdisciplinary or other orthodoxy. Publisher Information SAGE Publications is an academic and professional publisher. We publish books, journals and software under the SAGE, Corwin Press, Paul Chapman Publishing, Pine Forge Press, SAGE Reference, SAGE Science and Scolari (US and Europe websites) imprints. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
Which of the following is a good example of a unitary nation state?Unitary System
Power is not shared between states, counties, or provinces. Examples: China, United Kingdom (although Scotland has been granted self-rule).
Which of the following most accurately describes a unitary system of government?Which of the following best describes a unitary system of government? The central government holds the power to regulate all governmental activity, only distributing limited power to the state government.
Which of the following is most likely a reason for the emergence of the modern state in Europe rather than in another region?Which of the following is most likely a reason for the emergence of the modern state in Europe rather than in another region? 16. The development of the modern state in Europe was partly encouraged by: linguistic and ethnic fragmentation.
What is the system of government called in which states form a union and share sovereign power with the central government of the Union?Federalism is the system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments; in the United States, both the national government and the state governments possess a large measure of sovereignty.
|