Which intervention is safest for a patient who gains 8 kg in a week while taking pramipexole

Brief Summary:

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Pramipexole versus placebo for 6 weeks in children (age 6-17) diagnosed with Tourette Disorder according to DSM IV criteria. The primary efficacy measure will be the Total Tic Score (TTS) of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) at 6 weeks.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Tourette Syndrome Drug: pramipexole immediate release (IR) Drug: Placebo Phase 2

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 63 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Flexible Dose Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pramipexole Immediate Release (0.125-0.5mg/Day) Versus Placebo for 6 Weeks in Children and Adolescents (Age 6-17 Inclusive) Diagnosed With Tourette Disorder According to DSM IV Criteria.
Study Start Date : January 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date : June 2009

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Which intervention is safest for a patient who gains 8 kg in a week while taking pramipexole


Arm Intervention/treatment
Pramipexole Drug: pramipexole immediate release (IR)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Drug: Placebo


Primary Outcome Measures :

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale [ Time Frame: baseline 6 weeks ]

    Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50.

    Analysis was adjusted for baseline total tic score and age as linear covariates.



Secondary Outcome Measures :

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 1 [ Time Frame: baseline 1 week ]

    Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50


  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 2 [ Time Frame: baseline and 2 weeks ]

    Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50


  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 3 [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 weeks ]

    Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50


  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Week 4 [ Time Frame: baseline and 4 weeks ]

    Total Tic Score is the sum of ten individual ratings of the impairment due to tics. Each scale ranges from 0 (None/Absent) to 5 (Severe) and total score ranges from 0 to 50


  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline and 6 weeks ]

    Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)


  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 1 [ Time Frame: baseline 1 week ]

    Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)


  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 2 [ Time Frame: baseline and 2 weeks ]

    Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)


  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 3 [ Time Frame: baseline and 3 weeks ]

    Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)


  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Due to Motor and Phonic Tics at Week 4 [ Time Frame: baseline 4 weeks ]

    Total Score is a rating of the overall impairment due to motor and phonic tics. The scale ranges from 0 (None) to 50 (Severe)


  10. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at 1 Week [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 1 ]

    Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.


  11. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 2 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 2 ]

    Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.


  12. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 3 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 3 ]

    Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.


  13. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 4 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 4 ]

    Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.


  14. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 6 ]

    Overall improvement during the last week compared to baseline ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), to 7 (very much worse). Responder has 'very much' or 'much' improvement. Non responder has less improvement than 'much' improvement.


  15. Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 1 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 1 ]

    Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.


  16. Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 2 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 2 ]

    Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.


  17. Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 3 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 3 ]

    Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.


  18. Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 4 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 4 ]

    Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.


  19. Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 6 ]

    Assessment of the overall severity of illness on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (the most extremely ill patients). Improved, Unchanged and Worsened responses correspond to changes from baseline of: -2 or less, -1 to +1, and 2 or greater.


  20. Patient Global Impression at Week 1 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 1 ]

    Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).


  21. Patient Global Impression at Week 2 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 2 ]

    Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).


  22. Patient Global Impression at Week 3 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 3 ]

    Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).


  23. Patient Global Impression at Week 4 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 4 ]

    Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).


  24. Patient Global Impression at Week 6 [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 6 ]

    Assessment of the change of the patient's overall condition during the last week compared to the patient's condition at baseline on a scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). A responder is defined as having a response of very much (1) or much better (2).


  25. Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Orthostatic Reaction and Pulse Rate), and Serum Chemistry. [ Time Frame: baseline and Week 6 ]



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Which intervention is safest for a patient who gains 8 kg in a week while taking pramipexole

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information

Ages Eligible for Study:   6 Years to 17 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male of female patients 6-17 yrs.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder with a > or equal to 22 on the Total Tic Score at baseline.
  • Diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder when administering the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.
  • Having at least 1 tic/day.
  • Women of childbearing age must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and must use a medically accepted contraceptive method.
  • Either a newly diagnosed patient or a patient diagnosed with Tourette's Disorder who can safely discontinue treatment.
  • Having a body weight of > or equal to 20 kg (44 lbs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any women of childbearing age having a positive serum pregnancy test at screening.
  • Patients who have clinically significant renal disease or serum creatinine greater than 1.0 mg/dL at screening.
  • Lab results at screening: hemoglobin below lower limit of normal which is determined to be clinically significant; Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), triiodothyronine (T3) or thyroxine (T4) clinically significant; clinically significant abnormalities in labs.
  • Other clinically significant metabolic-endocrine, hematological, gastrointestinal disease, pulmonary disease which would preclude the patient from participating in this study.
  • History of Schizophrenia or any psychotic disorder, history of mental disorders or any present Axis I psychiatric disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) requiring any medical therapy except for patients with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who are not on therapy.
  • History of/or clinical signs of epilepsy or seizures other than fever related seizures in early childhood.
  • History of/or clinical signs of any malignant neoplasm.
  • Allergic response to pramipexole.
  • Had previous treatment with dopamine agonists other than pramipexole within 14 days prior to baseline visit.
  • Had any other medical treatment for Tourette's Disorder besides the study medication within 28 days prior to baseline visit.
  • Had withdrawal symptoms of any medication at screening or at the baseline visit.
  • Having a Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT IQ) score <70 at screening.
  • Having a children's Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (CY-BOCS) score of >15 at baseline.
  • Patients who meet criteria for Restless Legs Syndrome and or Periodic Limb Movement disorder.
  • Patients with severe asthma.
  • Patients that have initiated psychotherapy for Tourette's Disorder, OCD or ADHD within 3 mths of starting the trial.
  • Patients receiving psychological, cognitive and/or behavioral treatments greater than 3 mths prior to start of trial for Tourette's Disorder, OCD, and/or ADHD who will have changes in treatment plan.


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Which intervention is safest for a patient who gains 8 kg in a week while taking pramipexole

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00558467


Layout table for location information

United States, Florida
248.644.0026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bradenton, Florida, United States
248.644.0025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
United States, Georgia
248.644.0006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, United States
United States, Illinois
248.644.0012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
United States, Massachusetts
248.644.0005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
United States, New York
248.644.0003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, United States
248.644.0009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
248.644.0018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
248.644.0013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Orangeburg, New York, United States
United States, Oklahoma
248.644.0029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
United States, Rhode Island
248.644.0010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
United States, Tennessee
248.644.0030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
United States, Texas
248.644.0008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
United States, Virginia
248.644.0023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Germany
248.644.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hannover, Germany
248.644.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ulm, Germany

Boehringer Ingelheim

Layout table for investigator information

Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Boehringer Ingelheim


Layout table for additonal information

Responsible Party: Boehringer Ingelheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00558467    
Other Study ID Numbers: 248.644
First Posted: November 15, 2007    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: October 20, 2010
Last Update Posted: May 16, 2014
Last Verified: March 2014

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Layout table for MeSH terms

Tourette Syndrome
Basal Ganglia Diseases
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Tic Disorders
Movement Disorders
Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Mental Disorders
Pramipexole
Antioxidants
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Protective Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antiparkinson Agents
Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
Dopamine Agonists
Dopamine Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents

Which possible adverse effect is associated with the use of dopamine replacement drugs?

Long-term use of dopamine agonists may cause choreiform and dystonic movements and psychiatric disturbances. Hallucinations, delusions, confusion, depression, and mania are some of the most common adverse effects related to the long-term use of these medications.

Which class of drugs is administered to treat on off fluctuations in a patient with Parkinson disease?

The catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors tolcapone (brand name: Tasmar) and entacapone (brand name: Comtan) may be used to prolong and enhance the effect of levodopa. The treatment is primarily used for people with motor fluctuations who have "wearing off" periods at the end of their dose of levodopa.

Which foods should you teach the patient prescribed selegiline to avoid?

While taking selegiline and for 14 days after you stop, you must NOT eat foods that are high in tyramine, including:.
air dried meats, aged or fermented meats, sausage or salami (including cacciatore and mortadella), pickled herring;.
any spoiled or improperly stored beef, poultry, fish, or liver;.

Which outcome is the goal of pharmacologic therapy in treating Parkinson's disease?

The main drug treatments used for PD help increase dopamine levels in the brain. By doing so, they relieve the symptoms of PD.