1. How is the New Jersey Plan a rejection of the Revised Virginia Plan? How are we to interpret Dickinson’s remark that it was Madison’s unwillingness to compromise that brought about this breakdown in negotiations. Where does the Three-Fifths Clause fit in to the two documents? Can we say that these two documents show it is pretty clear that the key debate is between the small states and the large states? Show
2. Is the Revised Virginia Plan pretty much the same as the original Virginia Plan? Is the New Jersey Plan pretty much the same as the Articles of Confederation? IntroductionOn June 13, the delegates completed their second discussion of the Virginia Plan. The 19 resolutions of the amended Virginia Plan preserved the new institutional structure proposed by the original plan. On June 15, however, William Patterson presented the alternative New Jersey Plan. It restored the structure of the Articles of Confederation but also increased the powers of Congress. Why, after two weeks of negotiation concerning the representation of people, states, and wealth, would the New Jersey coalition be willing to start all over again? Madison provided an answer in the footnote (reproduced below) he added to his account of the debate on June 15. For different reasons, a coalition of states had formed opposed to a national government as proposed in the Virginia Plan. —Gordon Lloyd Source: Gordon Lloyd, ed., Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member (Ashland, OH: Ashbrook Center, 2014), 77–86.The Revised Virginia Plan . . . Mr. GORHAM[1] made a report, which was postponed till to-morrow, to give an opportunity for other plans to be proposed – the Report was in the words following:
The New Jersey Plan In Convention, – Mr. PATTERSON[2] laid before the Convention the plan which he said several of the Deputations wished to be substituted in place of that proposed by Mr. RANDOLPH[3] [the Virginia Plan]. After some little discussion of the most proper mode of giving it a fair deliberation, it was agreed, that it should be referred to a Committee of the Whole; and that, in order to place the two plans in due comparison, the other should be recommitted. At the earnest request of Mr. LANSING[4] and some other gentleman, it was also agreed that the Convention should not go into Committee of the Whole on the subject till to-morrow; by which delay the friends of the plan proposed by Mr. PATTERSON would be better prepared to explain and support it, and all would have an opportunity of taking copies.* The propositions from New Jersey, moved by Mr. PATTERSON, were in the words following:
* [Madison’s footnote] This plan had been concerted among the Deputations, or members thereof, from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and perhaps Mr. Martin, from Maryland, who made with them a common cause, though on different principles. Connecticut and New York were against a departure from the principle of the Confederation, wishing rather to add a few new powers to Congress than to substitute a National Government. The States of New Jersey and Delaware were opposed to a National Government, because its patrons considered a proportional representation of the States as the basis of it. The eagerness displayed by the members opposed to a National Government, from these different motives, began now to produce serious anxiety for the result of the Convention. Mr. Dickinson said to Mr. Madison, “You see the consequence of pushing things too far. Some of the members from the small States wish for two branches in the General Legislature, and are friends to a good National Government; but we would sooner submit to a foreign power, than submit to be deprived, in both branches of the legislature, of an equality of suffrage, and thereby be thrown under the domination of the larger States.” What are the main differences between the New Jersey plan and the Virginia Plan?James Madison wrote the Virginia Plan, which called for states with larger populations to have more representation in the government. As an alternative, William Paterson presented the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for every state no matter what the population.
What were 3 key parts of the Virginia Plan?Introduced to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, James Madison's Virginia Plan outlined a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
What was the main difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan brought forth at the Constitutional Convention quizlet?what was the main difference between the virginia plan and the new jersey plan? the virginia plan called for a bicameral legislature and representation would be based on population, and the new jersey plan had a unicameral legislature and each state had the same # of votes. What was the three-fifths compromise?
What was the main difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan what decision was eventually reached?*What was the main difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan? The Virginia Plan called for a two-house legislature with more representation for larger states; the New Jersey Plan called for a one-house legislature with equal representation for all states.
|