What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

Racial Stereotypes of the Civil War Era



Page overview: click on a link to go directly to a discussion of that topic below.

Dominating the wartime debate in the north about what should be done with slaves were three recurring questions:

    • Could they learn?
    • Would they work?
    • Could they be civilized?

And a fourth was added as the war continued and the need for troops became more desperate: Can they and will they fight?

These questions reflected stereotypes about race that could be traced back at least as far asquestions raised by Thomas Jefferson in Notes on the State of Virginia. Jefferson had conjectured that blacks were inferior to whites with respect to their capacity for reason, imagination, and sentiment. By the 19th century, American "craniometrists" claimed to use science to prove that blacks and whites were from different species.

The popularity and persistence of these stereotypes in the North can be seen in articles and cartoons published in Northern newspapers that represented African-Americans as unwilling to work and incapable of learning and being civilized. Often represented as pathetic, comically or exotically picturesque, or hilariously or horrifyingly grotesque, African-Americans were seen as the "other." White Northerners liked to think of themselves as a hard-working, educated, and moral people, and African-Americans were typically stereotyped as lazy, ignorant, and uncivilized: an inverse image of what it meant to be an American.

This website explores the ways how these stereotypes were sometimes reinforced and sometimes rebutted by Northern newspapers and by the letters of freedmen and their teachers. It also suggests the ways these images helped shape Northern discussions about the war.


Click on any topic below to OPEN/CLOSE once the page has finished loading:

or choose + Open All Topics   or  - Close All Topics

The Wartime Debate in the North: Four Questions about African-Americans


During the 18th and 19th centuries, supporters of slavery in America argued that blacks were suited to servitude because they lacked the intelligence to learn, lacked the initiative to work independently, and lacked the qualities of morality and domesticity necessary for living in a democratic society.

In response, abolitionists had argued that it was the institution of slavery itself that kept African-Americans from demonstrating and developing intelligence, industry, and virtue since, for example, most slaves were forbidden to learn, forced to work for others, and separated from their spouses and children whenever it suited the economic interests of their masters.What advocates of slavery saw as a fact of nature, opponents explained as a consequence of nurture. And yet, the fact that both the proponents and opponents of slavery talked about the same three issues of learning, working, and civilization reflected a broader acceptance of racial stereotypes in popular culture.

The war only intensified the debate in the North over whether African-Americans were capable of being part of American society, since it meant that a series of decisions would need to be made about what to do with the slaves who would come under the control of Union forces. Should slaves freeing from their confederate masters be returned to their owners, even though the slaves were being used to support the Southern military effort? Should slaves captured by the Union army be forced to continue working on plantations for the benefit of the North? Should former slaves be sent to colonize a remote area of the West or to an island in the Carribbean? In each case, concerns about the ability and willingness of African-Americans to learn, earn, and live as civilized citizens, shaped the policies adopted by the federal government and the behavior of private individuals and groups.

Consider the ways in which the following primary resources below raise depict African-Americans in ways that raise or answer questions about their ability to learn, work, live civilized lives, and fight for freedom. Do they suggest that "nature" or "nurture" are the real issue? In other words, do they suggest that the experience of freedom would transform the former slaves into model Americans?

Douglass Describes His Life as a Free Man
in a Letter to His Former Master

I therefore made an effort so to improve my mind and deportment, as to be somewhat fitted to the station to which I seemed almost providentially called. The transition from degradation to respectability was indeed great, and to get from one to the other without carrying some marks of one's former condition, is truly a difficult matter. I would not have you think that I am now entirely clear of all plantation peculiarities, but my friends here, while they entertain the strongest dislike to them, regard me with that charity to which my past life somewhat entitles me, so that my condition in this respect is exceedingly pleasant. So far as my domestic affairs are concerned, I can boast of as comfortable a dwelling as your own. I have an industrious and neat companion, and four dear children—the oldest a girl of nine years, and three fine boys, the oldest eight, the next six, and the youngest four years old. The three oldest are now going regularly to school—two can read and write, and the other can spell with tolerable correctness words of two syllables: Dear fellows! they are all in comfortable beds, and are sound asleep, perfectly secure under my own roof. There are no slaveholders here to rend my heart by snatching them from my arms, or blast a mother's dearest hopes by tearing them from her bosom. These dear children are ours—not to work up into rice, sugar and tobacco, but to watch over, regard, and protect, and to rear them up in the nurture and admonition of the gospel—to train them up in the paths of wisdom and virtue, and, as far as we can to make them useful to the world and to themselves. Oh! sir, a slaveholder never appears to me so completely an agent of hell, as when I think of and look upon my dear children. It is then that my feelings rise above my control.

--from Frederick Douglass, Letter to Thomas Auld, September 3, 1848, published in The Liberator, September 22, 1848

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

Is it not astonishing, that while we are ploughing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses and constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, and copper, siler vand gold; that while we are reading, writing, and ciphering, acting as clerks, merchants, and secretaries, having among us layers, doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators, and teachers; that while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises commmon to other men, digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, breeding sheep and cattle on the hillside; living, moving, acting, thinking, planning; living in families as husbands, wives, and children; and, above all, confessing and worshipping the Christian's God, and looking hopefully for immortal life beyond the grave; -- is it not astonishing, I say, that we are called upon to prove that we are men?"

--Frederick Douglass, "A Pertinent Question," The Freedmen's Book, Lydia Maria Child, ed. (Boston: Ticknor and Fields:, 1865): 93.

The First and Last Paragraphs of Edward Pierce's Report on
"The Freedmen at Port Royal"

JOHN ADAMS’S axiom, that civil society must be built up on the four corner-stones of the church. the school-house, the militia, and the town-meeting, receives new illustration, of the most distinct kind, as we work out the great problem of to-day. Whichever panacea is presented to us in the great work of the admission of the four million negroes into our civil society, and the establishment of their social rights, fails to pass test till we have so extended the proposed arrangements that, in its work of blessing, all four of the essential rights of religion, education, self-defence, and self-government are provided for. Thus, it is of little use to give the negro a vote, unless he can read it; nor, if he can read it, unless he can defend himself from being shot down like a dog as be offers it; while, again, voting and defence both suppose a conscience fitly trained for their right exercise.


The negroes will work for a living. They will fight for their freedom. They are adapted to civil society. . . . They have shown capacity for knowledge, for free industry, for subordination to law and discipline, for soldierly fortitude, for social and family relations, for religious culture and aspirations; and these qualities, when stirred and sustained by the incitements and rewards of a just society, and combining, with the currents of our continental civilization, will, under the guidance of a benevolent Providence which forgets neither them nor us, make them a constantly progressive race, and secure them ever after from the calamity of another enslavement, and ourselves from the worse calamity of being again their oppressors.

--Edward L. Pierce, "The Freedmen at Port Royal," The Atlantic Monthly,September, 1863, 291-315

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

April, 1864, Civil War Cartoons Collection, American Antiquarian Society

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

Proclamation of Emancipation, [New York]: L.N. Rosenthal, 327 Walnut Street, 1865.

Click on individual sections of the poster above for larger versions,
or click here for a larger version of the whole..

The lithograph above offers the text of the Emancipation Proclamation, framed above by portraits of Founders (including Franklin, Jefferson, and Washington), bracketed above by the images of William Penn and John Wesley and to the sides by the faces of female abolitionists Lucretia Mott and Lydia Maria Child.Lincoln holds the central position at the bottom of the broadside, and he is surrounded by a variety of individuals, each of whom played some role in the process that had lead to the emancipation proclamation. Included are Wendell Phillips, Gerritt Smith, Salmon Chase, Henry Ward Beecher, and General Butler.

On one side of the proclamation are images of slavery, including classic scenes of slaves being whipped, a slave family on the auction block, a manacled slave, and a slave being hunted by bloodhounds. Presiding over that side of the lithograph is the image of a fallen angel bearing manacles; directly below her three faces peer from the shadows.

The other side features iconographic representations of life under liberty. An angel (probably representing fame) presides over sequence, which includes the image of a schoolroom with black students, a well-dressed and happy family in a room with pictures and books, a black farmer cultivating his fields, and a man (dressed exactly like the hunted fugitive slave on the opposite side) kneeling before Columbia and surrounded by the symbols of commerce, progress, and education.

 

One Source of Those Questions: Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia


While Thomas Jefferson proposed the elimination of slavery in his eary drafts of the Declaration of Independence and proposed a gradual system of emancipation in Query XIV of Notes on the State of Virginia, his comments on blacks in Notes suggest that he harbored questions about whether they were, in fact, human beings. Explaining why he believed that colonization was the only way of dealing with free blacks, Jefferson referred to the "deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained" and "the real distinctions which nature has made."

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

What were the so-called "real distinctions" that Jefferson thought separated blacks from whites?

Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous.

The terms "memory, reason, and imagination" would have been particularly significant for Enlightenment thinkers who had been influenced by Bacon's belief that all human understanding could be classified into exactly those three categories.

Detail from William. K. Rhinehart, "Fourth of July celebration, or, Southern ideas of Liberty-- July 4, '40," , ca. 1840

IMAGINATION

In terms of imagination, Jefferson saw blacks as inferior not only to whites, but to Native Americans as well.

The Indians, with no advantages . . . will often carve figures on their pipes not destitute of design and merit. They will crayon out an animal, a plant, or a country, so as to prove the existence of a germ in their minds which only wants cultivation. They astonish you with strokes of the most sublime oratory; such as prove their reason and sentiment strong, their imagination glowing and elevated. But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level of plain narration; never see even an elementary trait of painting or sculpture. In music they are more generally gifted than the whites with accurate ears for tune and time, and they have been found capable of imagining a small catch. Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved. Misery is often the parent of the most affecting touches in poetry-.-Among the blacks is misery enough, God knows, but no poetry.

REASON

By far the most important of the three types of understanding, however, was reason. While conceding that most slaves "indeed have been confined to tillage, to their own homes, and their own society" Jefferson went on to remark:

Yet many have been so situated, that they might have availed themselves of the conversation of their masters; many have been brought up to the handicraft arts, and from that circumstance have always been associated with the whites. Some have been liberally educated, and all have lived in countries where the arts and sciences are cultivated to a considerable degree, and have had before their eyes samples of the best works from abroad.

Jefferson even used his observation that slaves were disposed to sleep when not at work as evidence of their lack of a capacity for reason.

In general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection. To this must be ascribed their disposition to sleep when abstracted from their diversions, and unemployed in labour. An animal whose body is at rest, and who does not reflect, must be disposed to sleep of course.

The fact that Jefferson chose to describe the sleeping African-American as "an animal whose body is at rest" seems, in this context, more than coincidental. The belief that blacks performed poorly in two of these three categories would have weighed heavily in the mind of a man like Jefferson, who placed such a high value on these concepts that he had organized his own extensive library into sections based on "memory," "reason," and "imagination."

SENTIMENT

While it would be hard to overstate the importance of reason in 18th century thought in England and America, rationality did not rule alone The ability to feel and express sentiment was also regarded by Jefferson and other "enlightened" thinkers of that time as an important characteristic of civilized human beings .

In his book, Sentimental Democracy, Andrew Burstein argues that Jefferson and other Enlightenment thinkers believed that human beings were "at once sentient and rational" and thus "needed to maintain a proper balance between these two facets of their behavioral system in order to achieve happiness." According to Jefferson, blacks failed to live up to this standard as well. He observed: "They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation."

A creature of "sensation" rather than "sentiment" would not only be incapable of true love, but also of morality. As Burstein explains:

[Adam] Smith described the sensations of sentiment and passion as "affection of the heart from which any action proceeds," and he characterized virtue and propriety, the experiences of grief and joy, taste and judgment, concord and discord, opinions and moral standards. . . . The man of virtuous sentiment, cultivating a sense of duty, overcame the impulse of self-love through reason principle, and conscience--by reflecting on the precariousness of existence and discovering "the man within."

Jefferson might have wondered how slaves could learn "virtue and propriety" if, as he claimed: "Their griefs are transient. Those numberless afflictions, which render it doubtful whether heaven has given life to us in mercy or in wrath, are less felt, and sooner forgotten with them"? And since the man of sentiment learns virtue through the action of reason on emotion, how could an African-American ever live up to the 18th century conception of the man of sensibility?

19th Century Claims that Science Proved the Inferiority of African-Americans


Although Jefferson assumed that the perceived inferiority of blacks to whites might only indicate they were a separate "genus," there were other writers willing to argue African-Americans were a separate species and support for this view continued to be gathered by the advocates of slavery. As early as 1817, Edward D. Grifin, pastor of the Second Presbyterian Church in Newark, New Jersey opened a sermon preached to collect money for the benefit of The African School by stating:

I rise to plead the cause of a people who until lately have seldom had an advocate . . . They who have wished to find an apology for the slave-trade . . . have cast the Africans into another species, and sorted them with the ape and the orang-outang. In every plea for the improvement of the African race, this, or an approach to this, is the prejudice with which we have chiefly to contend.

--"A Plea for Africa: A Sermon Preached October 26, 1817, in the First Presbyterian Church in the City of New York, Before the Synod of New York and New Jersey," (New York: Gould: 1817) 3.

In the 1830s, the field of "craniometry" purported to offer evidence collected from many populations that blacks had smaller brains than whites. The opponents of abolition argued that because blacks were unable to learn, they would never be able to vote intelligently, contribute to the market economy, or even read the Bible. 

Comments by Craniometrists

Permanent subjection to a foreign yoke, is the result of an inferior aggregate development of brain, animal, moral and intellectual, in the people subdued, to that possessed by the conquering tribes . . .

Independence, civilisation, and political freedom, are the results of large aggregate size of brain, the moral and intellectual regions predominating in the majority of the people, aided by long cultivation. This combination characterizes the British, Anglo-Americans, and Swiss.

--Samuel Morton, Crania Americana, 1831


The lengthy arguments concerning the intellect of the negroe drawn from history, and the numerous explanations of his mental inferiority, which have at various times been given, (without supposing him of a distinct species,) are rendered totally useless, if it can be shown, that the portion of his brain, which presides over the animal functions, exceeds, to any great extent, that from which the mental endowments arise. Furthermore, although we are not believers in physiognomy, (as a science,) yet we cannot avoid making a remark upon the negro's face, which may not be entirely overlooked--although we may thereby risk the commission of a tautology.

His lips are thick, his zygomatic muscles, large and full* (*"These muscles are always in action during laughter and the extreme enlargement of them indicates a low mind." Lavater)--his jaws large and projecting,--his chin retreating,--his forehead low, flat and slanting, and (as a consequence of this latter character,) his eyeballs are very prominent,--apparently larger than those of white men;--all of these peculiarities at the same time contributing to reduce his facial angle almost to a level with that of the brute--Can any such man become great or elevated?--the history of the Africans will give a decisive answer. Even the ancients were fully aware of this kind of mutual coincidence, between the facial angle, and the powers of the mind: consequently, in their statues of heroes and philosophers, they usually extended the angle to 90 degrees,--making that of the Gods to be 100: beyond which, it cannot be enlarged without deformity. Modern anatomists have fixed the average facial angle of the European at 80--negro 70,--ourang outang 58--all brutes below 70, the average angle of quadrupeds being about 20.. . .

If then it is consistent with science, to believe that the mind will be great in proportion to the size and figure of the brain: it is equally reasonable to suppose, that the acknowledged meanness of the negroe's intellect, only coincides with the shape of his head; or in other words, that his want of capability to receive a complicated education renders it improper and impolitic, that he should be allowed the privileges of citizenship in an enlightened country! It is in vain for the Amalgamationists to tell us that the negroes have had no opportunity to improve, or have had less opportunities than European nations; the public are well aware that three or four thousand years could not have passed away, without throwing advantages in the way of the Africans; yet in all this time, with every advantage that liberty, and their proximity to refined nations could bestow, they have never even attempted to raise themselves above their present equivocal station, in the great zoological chain.

--Richard H. Colfax, Evidence Against the Views of the Abolitionists, Consisting of Physical and Moral Proofs, of the Natural Inferiority of the Negroes, 1833


Look at the Negro, so well known to you, and say, need I describe him? Is he shaped like any white person Is the anatomy of his frame, of his muscles, or organs like ours? Does he walk like us, think like us, act like us? Not in the least. . .

The past history of the Negro, of the Caffre, of the Hottentot, and of the Bosjeman, is simply a blank--St. Domingo forming but an episode. Can the black races become civilized? I should say not: their future history, then, must resemble the past. The Saxon race will never tolerate them--never amalgamate-never be at peace. . . .

Wild, visionary, and pitiable theories have been offered respecting the colour of the black man, as if he differed only in colour from the white races; but he differs in everything else as much as in colour. He is no more a white man than an ass is a horse or a zebra: if the Israelite finds his ten tribes amongst them I shall be happy.

--Robert Knox, The Races of Men: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Influence of Race Over the Destinies of Nations, 1862

What does he suggest about the relationship among freedmen and former slaveowners in his painting?

Samuel Morton, Crania Americana, 1831

Which statement is true about the petition of committee in behalf of the freedmen to Andrew Johnson quizlet?

Which statement is true about the "Petition of Committee in Behalf of the Freedmen to Andrew Johnson"? The petitioners demanded land on the grounds that they had made the lands valuable through their labor.

What does it reveal about the realities of emancipation quizlet?

What does it reveal about the realities of emancipation? Former slaves no longer lived in communal housing, but had their own quarters. Former slaves built their own churches and schools on the plantation. Former slaves occupied and farmed their own plots of land.

Why did Congress bring articles of impeachment against Andrew Jackson quizlet?

Reasons for bringing articles of impeachment against Andrew Jackson: He violated the Tenure of Office Act. *saw the act as a violation of his constitutional powers so he removed Sec. of War Edwin M.

What visions of freedom did the former slaves and slaveholders pursue in the postwar South?

What visions of freedom did the former slaves and slaveholders pursue in the postwar South? Overall, former slaves had a vision of a reconstructed South. Blacks wanted to enjoy the same opportunities and freedoms as whites did, and now was their chance to achieve that.