If a group is highly cohesive then it will be highly productive even with low performance norms

What are the Negative Effects of Group Cohesion?

While groups, particularly groups that function as teams, have numerous benefits, there are also certain negative attributes commonly associated with groups. 

Cohesion is generally a positive group attribute. It can also lead to groups function as teams. High levels of cohesion can have negative impacts on individual member productivity and group performance. 

Back to: BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

High levels of cohesion can cause pressure for members to conform their behavior to adhere to group norms. In an effort to maintain civility and not be criticized or ostracized by other members, individuals stop voicing their individual opinions. 

This sacrifices diversity of thought and critical feedback from group members. 

This can further close off the group from external inputs and ideas. 

This has a tendency to result in an inability to see environmental changes. 

It also results in groups adopting extreme ideas that go unchallenged. 

Groupthink is a further result of a failure of a diverse and critical input. It leads to flawed decision making caused by reductions in mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment. 

High levels of cohesion can also result in group members spending more time interacting socially than working on individual tasks. Further, high levels of cohesion and common though can cause group goals that may begin to diverge from organizational goals. 

Cohesion is marked by acceptance of group norms. The method of avoiding the complacency and drifting of group goals is to integrate a high level of focus on task completion.

Abstract

What kind of organizational conditions encourage work groups to be concerned about performing efficiently? This paper examines some of the determinants of group performance norms in an industrial firm. Encouragement of efficiency and attempts by the foreman to obtain rewards for subordinates together are associated with high performance norms, but each alone has a negative effect on performance. Close supervision is found, in seeming contradiction to previous studies, to facilitate high performance norms. Reward for efficiency and strong group cohesiveness have the best effects when supervision is close. The conditions under which close supervision is effective and ineffective are discussed.

Journal Information

Founded in 1956 by James Thompson, the Administrative Science Quarterly is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal publishing theoretical and empirical work that advances the study of organizational behavior and theory. ASQ publishes articles that contribute to organization theory from a number of disciplines, including organizational behavior and theory, sociology, psychology and social psychology, strategic management, economics, public administration, and industrial relations. ASQ publishes both qualitative and quantitative work, as well as purely theoretical papers. Theoretical perspectives and topics in ASQ range from micro to macro, from lab experiments in psychology to work on nation-states. An occasional feature is the "ASQ Forum," an essay on a special topic with invited commentaries. Thoughtful reviews of books relevant to organization studies and management theory are a regular feature. Special issues have explored qualitative methods, organizational culture, the utilization of organizational research, the distribution of rewards in organizations, and critical perspectives on organizational control.

Publisher Information

Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com

Read this article to learn about the meaning, its consequences and managerial actions for increase and decrease of cohesiveness.

Meaning of Cohesiveness:

Group cohesiveness is one of the characteristic features of the groups, which is very important from behaviouristic point of view. Cohesiveness is the degree to which the group members are attracted to each other and are motivated to stay in the groups. Cohesiveness defines the degree of closeness that the members feel with the groups. It is understood as the extent of liking each member has towards others in the group and how far everyone wants to remain as a member of the group.

“Cohesiveness refers to the extent of unity ‘in the group and is reflected in members’ conformity to the norms of the group, feeling of attraction for each other and wanting to be co-members of the group.” Attraction, cohesiveness and conformity are all intertwined. The more the members feel attracted to the group, the greater will be the group cohesiveness. The greater the cohesiveness, the greater the influence of the group members to persuade one another to conform to the group norms. The greater the conformity, the greater the identity of the members to the group and the greater the group cohesiveness.

Cohesiveness is a very important group attribute. Managers must offer answer to such questions as:

(i) What are the sources and causes of cohesiveness

(ii) What are the consequences of cohesiveness.

Now we will explain the answers to these questions in detail:

Consequences of Cohesiveness:

Group cohesiveness has only positive consequences.

These positive outcomes are explained in detail as follows:

1. More Participation:

Higher the degree of group cohesiveness, closer will be the interpersonal relationships among the members. As a result members will participate actively in group affairs and activities. As the members consider the group as their own, just like a family, they will help other members of the group in times of need which will further strengthen their bonds. The turnover of members will be very low. If possible, all the members attend the group meetings and group activities and take active part in discussions relating to preparing of strategies for achieving individual and group goals.

2. More Conformity:

One of the factors which influence cohesiveness is similarity of attitudes and values. As a result, members tend to like each other and perceive themselves as similar. These characteristics lead members to be relatively dependent on the group for satisfaction and, thus, they are susceptible to being influenced. For example, if any member is getting involved in organisational politics for enhancing his personal goals, the group might put social pressure on him and make him comply with the group norms.

3. More Success:

Cohesiveness and success are mutually dependent upon each other. Cohesiveness makes the goal achievement easier and goal achievement adds to success. The reason for this relationship is that higher degree of cohesiveness leads to high degree of communication, participation and conformity to group norms. Such coordinated efforts result in agreement about the goals to be achieved, the methods of achieving them and finally achieving the final goals.

4. More Communication:

Members of cohesive groups communicate with each other more than the members of non-cohesive groups. Because the members share common ideologies, goals, backgrounds or attitudes, they are inclined to greater communicativeness. Such communication is reinforcing as it tends to foster and cement positive social relations as well as depth in personal relationships.

5. More Personal Satisfaction:

Members of cohesive groups are more satisfied as compared to members of non-cohesive groups. Thus is understandable because if members are not satisfied they will leave the group and join some other group. Members are more satisfied due to so many factors which include friendliness, respect, support, achievement, protection and a feeling of security.

6. High Productivity:

Cohesiveness may contribute to increased productivity because:

(i) People in cohesive groups experience fewer work related anxieties and tensions

(ii) Highly cohesive groups tend to have lower absenteeism and turnover and

(iii) Cohesiveness decreases productivity differences among groups.

Studies consistently show that the relationship of cohesiveness and productivity depends on the performance related norms established by the group. If performance related norms are high, a cohesive group will be more productive than will a less cohesive group. But if cohesiveness is high and performance norms are low, productivity will be low.

If cohesiveness is low and performance norms are high, productivity increases but less than in high cohesiveness-high norms situation. Where cohesiveness and performance related norms are both low, productivity will tend to fall into the low to moderate range.

These conclusions are summarized in the following figure:

If a group is highly cohesive then it will be highly productive even with low performance norms

The worst situation for the manager is a highly cohesive group with low performance norms. Here members are highly motivated to work for their personal satisfaction only not for the organisational goals. Here the success of the management will depend upon how to direct the activities of highly cohesive group towards the successful attainment of organisational goals.

The consequences of cohesiveness are now illustrated with the help of the following diagram:

If a group is highly cohesive then it will be highly productive even with low performance norms

Managerial Actions for Increasing or Encouraging Cohesiveness:

A manager can follow any one or more of the following suggestions to encourage cohesiveness:

1. Make the group smaller

2. Encourage agreement with group goals

3. Increase the time members spend together

4. Increase the status of the group and the perceived difficulty of getting membership of the group

5. Stimulate competition with other groups.

6. Give rewards to the group rather than to members.

7. Physically isolate the group

8. Increase membership homogeneity

9. Increase interaction among members

Managerial Actions to Decrease or Discourage Cohesiveness:

Sometimes high cohesiveness adversely affects the productivity. In such cases managers have to reduce the cohesiveness of the groups.

Following are some of the actions which can be taken by the managers:

1. Induce disagreement on group goals

2. Increase membership heterogeneity

3. Restrict interactions among members

4. Increase group size

5. Reduce the time members spend together

6. Allocate rewards to individuals rather than to group member.

7. Remove physical isolation

8. Disband the group

9. Introduce a dominating member

What is the relationship between performance norms cohesiveness and group productivity?

Cohesiveness is related to a group's productivity. In fact, the higher the cohesiveness, the more there's a chance of low productivity, if norms are not established well. If the group established solid, productive performance norms and their cohesiveness is high, then their productivity will ultimately be high.

Which of the following types of norms are likely to be the most common?

A performance norm is probably the most common, providing explicit indications on how hard members must perform, how to do the job, what level of tardiness is suitable, and the like. If they are internalized, these standards are capable of greatly affecting behavior and performance.

Which term refers to a set of expected Behaviour patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit?

The answer is c) role. Role specify a set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit.