Volume 45 - Article 43 | Pages 1297–1316
Date received: | 13 May 2021 |
Date published: | 16 Dec 2021 |
Word count: | 2492 |
Keywords: | COVID-19, division of labor, family, gender, life course |
DOI: | 10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.43 |
Abstract
Background: First evidence shows that lockdown and confinement measures were associated with a more egalitarian gender division of housework in the United Kingdom. However, we know little about how the gender division of housework adjusted in different phases of the pandemic.
Objective: We ask: (1) How did the gender division of housework change with the first national lockdown in March 2020? (2) Did observed changes persist when the lockdown measures were lifted or did couples revert to the gender division of housework observed before lockdown?
Methods: We describe changes in the share of housework done by women before, during, and after the first lockdown using data from the Understanding Society COVID-19 study and employing fixed effects regression for couples with pre-school or school age children and couples without children living at home.
Results: The lockdown measures affected the gender division of housework with differential effects by the age of the youngest child in the household. After the initial shock, couples with younger children and couples with school-age children reverted to their pre-pandemic gender division of housework. However, couples without children living at home sustained a more equal share of housework.
Conclusions: Like other shocks to the division of labor, couples tend to adapt to new circumstances, sustaining previous patterns of within household inequality. Initial signs of increasing gender equality at the start of the pandemic had already started to vanish for some by September 2020.
Contribution: We show the effects of lockdown depend on couples’ life course stage at the time of the shock.
Author's Affiliation
Alejandra Rodríguez Sánchez - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany [Email]
Anette Fasang - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany [Email]
Susan Harkness - University of Bristol, United Kingdom
[Email]
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
» The complexity of employment and family life courses across 20th century Europe: More evidence for larger cross-national differences but little change across 1916‒1966 birth cohorts
Volume 44 - Article
32
» Pathways to death: The co-occurrence of physical and mental health in the last years of life
Volume 38 - Article 53
» From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55
» Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
» Coronavirus and care: How the coronavirus crisis affected fathers' involvement in
Germany
Volume 44 - Article 4 | Keywords: COVID-19, family, gender
»
A world apart: Levels and determinants of excess mortality due to COVID-19 in care homes: The case of the Belgian region of Wallonia during the spring 2020 wave
Volume 45 - Article 33 | Keywords: COVID-19,
gender
» Proximity to mother over the life course in the United States: Overall patterns and racial differences
Volume 45 - Article 23 | Keywords:
family, life course
» Socioeconomic differentials in fertility in South Korea
Volume 44 - Article 39 | Keywords:
family, gender
» The complexity of employment and family life courses across 20th century Europe: More evidence for larger cross-national differences but little change across
1916‒1966 birth cohorts
Volume 44 - Article 32 | Keywords: family, life course