Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Show
Already have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $45.50 USD. How does it work?
journal article Probleme in the Evaluation of Training Health PersonnelHealth Education Monographs Vol. 3, No. 3, TRAINING (FALL 1975) , pp. 232-250 (19 pages) Published By: Sage Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45240436 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $45.50 - Download now and later Abstract The place of evaluation in the several phases of training programs is presented as an on-going educational process. The framework specifies the sources and methods of data collection on: (1) the improvement in trainee performance; (2) the relevance of the program to the community; (3) the involvement of appropriate groups in planning; (4) the planning process itself; (5) the utilization and diffusion of evaluative feedback; and (6) the consequences of the training activity for the sponsoring organization and consumer. Publisher Information Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution journal article Authentic Teacher Evaluation: A Two-Tiered Proposal for Formative and Summative AssessmentEnglish Education Vol. 46, No. 2 (January 2014) , pp. 165-185 (21 pages) Published By: National Council of Teachers of English https://www.jstor.org/stable/24570967 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Journal Information English Education is published by CEE, the Conference on English Education (a constituent organization of the National Council of Teachers of English), and serves as a forum for discussion of issues related to (1) the nature of the English education discipline, especially as it spans all levels of instruction, and (2) the education and development of teachers of English at all levels. Publisher Information The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), a not-for-profit professional association of educators, is dedicated to improving the teaching and learning of English and the language arts at all levels of education. Since 1911, NCTE has provided a forum for the profession, an array of opportunities for teachers to continue their professional growth throughout their careers, and a framework for cooperation to deal with issues that affect the teaching of English. For more information, please visit www.ncte.org. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which statement best differentiates formative evaluation from summative evaluation quizlet?Which of the following statements best differentiates formative evaluation from summative evaluation? Formative evaluation focuses on how to make a training program better, whereas summative evaluation helps to determine the extent to which trainees have changed after training.
Which training outcome measure is best?A pencil-and-paper test is the best means for measuring skill-based outcomes.
Is a process of previewing the training program with potential trainees and managers with other customer?Pilot testing refers to the process of previewing the training program with potential trainees and managers.
What is the process of collecting the outcomes needed to determine whether training is effective?Training evaluation is the systematic process of collecting information and using that information to improve your training. Evaluation provides feedback to help you identify if your training achieved your intended outcomes, and helps you make decisions about future trainings.
|
A ceo is likely more concerned with summative evaluation relative to formative evaluation.
Urheberrechte © © 2024 toptenid.com Inc.
